Theory: Absence Makes the Heart grow fonder / Out of Sight, Out of Mind

Some people say that this is true. Personally, I think that once someone is out of sight, one of two things happens (saying that 1 is one person, and 2 is the other):

• 1 begins to think about 2, and thinks of all the good times, making their memory in essence, "grow", becoming greater than life. The heart grow fonder in this way.
  
• 1 doesn't really think of the person much, but from time to time, they do see something that triggers the memory of the person in question, still making them remember, though they don't dwell on it. This doesn't really make the person more important to 1. 2 is just same old 2, no different than he/she was X years ago...
• Going back to the first of the three theories presented that I believe in on this subject, I believe the following is the most interesting. After some time, 1 forgets the little things about 2, and, being the person who does dwell on these things, 1 begins to worry about, let's say, 2's eye colour. Then, because he thinks of 2 so much, the first theory comes into place, and 2 becomes more larger-than-life.

I think that's, kinda interesting, all the same. Also, it seems obvious that I believe the opposite for "Out of Sight, out of Mind".

I'll try to post more frequently in the future.

Theory: Seeding

I've heard a theory that's been floating around for a long time now, and I'd just like to write it
down here. [If you know who came up with this theory, leave a comment and I'll add their name here].
It goes something like this:

How did life start? Why? It is possible that, when a certain meteor fell from the sky to the earth, it had come from another solar system, and had some form of life on it. Chances are, that it was bacterial life, since that's what we think that life here started as... If not, what started us off?

The last question is, I find a very interesting one... I wonder if we'll ever find the origin of life.

Theory: Theories and Ideas

Theories are essentially ideas that need yet to be proven, or at least, they are proven when enough evidence is shown to make them look true. Very rarely, a theory is entirely correct, unless it's very simple.
So then, if that's true, then I say this: no idea is entirely true. Somewhere, there's a untruth. Even in what I am saying now, someone can show me why it's wrong. My point is, maybe, whenever we talk, we invent new theories, or put new spins on ones that were presented to us just before.

Basically, when I say "David just left quickly to the supermarket.", this is what I believe. There is a slight possibility that I was hallucinating, that David did not in fact leave. Therefore, it's a theory. Then, when someone else says "He also took my twenty dollars strait out of my pocket!", this can be argued against with the very fact that David may not have taken the twenty, it's possible it wasn't a twenty, that he took it out of the person's hand, instead.
Even if David were to uphold these claims, then there would be the problem that he too could have been hallucinating... The possibilities are endless to this argument.